• Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its not all of them, and youd be pissed too if you paid 2k for a course that was taught by ChatGPT.

        • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Not really equivalent

          Companies have the jurisdiction to decide who to hire, and it’s painfully obvious if someone doesn’t know their own major

          And if a degree doesn’t lead to career growth, it doesn’t really mean much unfortunately.

          A college using ai to teach hundreds of students benefits none of the students, even the ones that genuinely want to learn

            • Turret3857@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Wait, so you think its okay to use the bullshit machine for mission critical work, but when its something completely non-consequential like your strawman college student who managed to get a degree and get hired by you using AI, thats when theres a problem???

              If I found out my fucking doctor was using this LLM bullshit to diagnose me, im getting the fuck out and finding another doctor because that tells me I might as well be diagnosing myself using chatgpt.

              Your false equivalency argument is failing you tremendously, not to mention the fact you brought this up for absolutely no reason other than to stir shit up. Students using AI has nothing to do with the University or College stealing money from students and replacing professors with AI. One falls on a large respected organization. The other falls on Billy Schmoe who any hiring manager could look at and know won’t be a good fit.

            • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well.

              Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students.

              In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad)

              In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort.

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      As much as I hate the weird blaming, CS majors do have a LOT more cases of cheating with AI.

      Mostly because there is half a generation of people raised by their parents to work at google someday, but still.