Six weeks ago, I was elected to Congress. I’m still waiting to be sworn in.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s recess of the U.S. House of Representatives during a time of grave national crises is shockingly irresponsible. House Republicans have been on vacation for six weeks while our economy crumbles, federal workers go without paychecks, health care premiums skyrocket and funding for food stamps dwindles. This is negligent and cruel.

  • DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    DEPUTIZE American Patriots . We will be your armed escorts to and from the House Floor. This shit needs to end and the only way it ends is with a huge show of FORCE. Force little Mike to swear her in.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would say judges should be the ones to swear in all elected officials in the federal government as in theory they are meant to be nonpartisan and unaffiliated but we all know that isn’t the reality of the situation. No party should be able to directly stop the action of any elected official based purely on their party affiliation or political platform. Even better still, elected individuals should be sworn in before the election results roll in and should take office the same day the election results are finalized.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    im thinking they are just stalling til her 2 year term expires, or nearly expires. this shutdown wont end in anytime soon as long as epstein files reveals trump as the most frequent sex pest of his.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That shitty rule needs to be changed. One wins the election and the Speaker of the House should be available for the swearing in process.

    • comeonitsnotlike@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      The uncomfortable option(s), are what’s left. Those option(s) will get drastically more uncomfortable with each day passing. Good luck, US.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The next three boxes are jury, soap, and ammo. I suspect it will come to the last one

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am usually not a fan of witholding taxes (I do think we should invest more taxes into social services and less in defense and none in company subsidies or bailouts), but Arizona really should consider witholding federal taxes until they have representation. Money talks.

      • ganryuu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s unfortunately not how that works, federal taxes are not held by the state but paid directly to the country, there’s no way for the state to withhold it.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The state can withhold the taxes from employees if the state though. Wouldn’t be insignificant

        • witten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Guess who’s the biggest employer in the state and also pays a shitton of federal employer payroll taxes.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      A legal challenge that forces his hand. Plus, some Republicans actually want to know the the truth about the Epstein thing.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    226
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why would he? He’s not required to (by anything enforceable), and it’s all they got to convince Dems to open the government back up. Dems would do the same thing.

    Edit: unpopular comment, but I’m 100% right. This is the least bad thing Republicans have done.

    Edit 2: your downvotes mean nothing. I’ve seen what makes you upvote.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Whoever made you believe dems would do the same, is not your friend.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the least bad thing Republicans have done.

      Kind of stupid to say something so egregious is the “least bad”.

      Stop whining about downvotes, it’s pathetic.

      Dems would do the same thing

      This is absolute bullshit, you’re not “100% right” by simply imagining something that never happened, you fucking imbecile.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Stop whining about downvotes, it’s pathetic.

        I’m not whining about shit. Lemmy can be an echo chamber incapable of handling non uniform opinions.

        One year from now nobody is going to remember this because it is literally the least bad of thing they’ve been doing.

        • Fluke@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          No-one will remember the longest US Govt. shutdown, ever? The one that dethroned the previous record, which was set during checks notes oh, right, Trump’s previous go at stuffing his pockets with tax dollars.

          I wouldn’t be so sure of that. When people start going hungry, people start getting angry. Anthropology has demonstrated this more times than almost anything else. If this keeps up, something “interesting” will happen, as the old curse goes.

    • potpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      “At the first session of Congress after every general election of Representatives, the oath of office shall be administered by any Member of the House of Representatives to the Speaker.”

      2 U.S. Code § 25

      “Shall” meaning it’s a requirement.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Congress hasn’t been in session yet. That’s the loophole. It’s stil. “Legal”

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Which is why I said “enforceable”.

            Like Trump leaving the FEC without a quorum so it can’t enforce election laws. There’s nothing forcing him to appoint anybody. So he leaves it vacant and none of the laws the FEC is responsible for enforcing can be enforced. They’re as good as non existent.

            Same with this. There’s no mechanism forcing this guy from swearing in the congressman.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a legal challenge in the works right now. The system takes time and humans need to do things like sleep and eat.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Great! And once that happens, there’s going to be zero penalty for Mike Johnson not doing his job. I’m not saying it’s a good strategy. I’m saying it’s all they got.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dems would do the same thing.

      Quit fucking lying, fascist apologist. The two sides are not the same.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Keep your head in the sand and ears in the echo chamber and everything will feel just right.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How is that a response? OP is fucking moron basing his idiotic argument using made-up evidence he invented in his head.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Block people that don’t give the exact same opinion as you. Head in the sand ears in the echo chamber.

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Dems would do the same thing.

      Right. The party known for playing hardball.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I almost passed over, but “Dems would do the same thing” is why I gave you the downvote. You give them more credit than they deserve.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      … I’m 100% right.

      and this is why you people never learn.

      He’s not required to (by anything enforceable),

      didn’t realize doing your job as an elected official required legal ramifications as motivation.

      … and it’s all they got to convince Dems to open the government back up.

      besides, democrats aren’t required to agree (by anything enforceable), and if that’s all republicans have to “convince” the democrats then how did they even gain majority control of the house and senate? unless…they cheated by gerrymandering…

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        2 days ago

        and this is why you people never learn.

        Sorry I didn’t meet the echo chamber’s approval. As a progressive democrat, I wish “we” would actually learn.

        didn’t realize doing your job as an elected official required legal ramifications as motivation.

        Now you know.

        besides, democrats aren’t required to agree (by anything enforceable), and if that’s all republicans have to “convince” the democrats then how did they even gain majority control of the house and senate? unless…they cheated by gerrymandering…

        I’m not 100% sure what point you’re making here. But I probably agree. Though I think when republicans win the popular vote for president, the gerrymandering probably isn’t the reason they won the house also.

        Next year they definitely need to cheat to win.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sorry I didn’t meet the echo chamber’s approval. As a progressive democrat, I wish “we” would actually learn.

          A “progressive” who gets to make up evidence that doesn’t exist, apparently. You phony fucking “progressives” gave us Trump, you don’t have the moral high ground.

          You’re so fucking biased and stupid that you actually think it’s justified to flat-out fucking lie like this.

    • takenaps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      More evidence that all yall care about is owning the libs & are willing to sacrifice everything for it… No actual care for our country’s values or democracy

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        50
        ·
        2 days ago

        This isn’t owning the libs. It’s politicking. What incentive do they have to confirm this person?

        • takenaps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 days ago

          The incentive is upholding liberty & justice as our elected officials. Our country has a representative government. This person was elected by the people. Anyone standing in the way of that is standing against the US.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            41
            ·
            2 days ago

            And their argument would be “if liberty & justice and representative government is so important, then allow us to reopen the government”. To me, this is just basic politics.

                • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I mean I wouldn’t doubt it, but that’s not what I was getting at. That’s one instance we’re you may be right in a hypothetical we can’t confirm.

                  You’re all over this thread with both sides bullshit without anything to back it up and downplaying Republicans evil, all willfully.

                  We can see you.

        • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Their job is to break all functions of government that don’t directly support rich people. It makes more sense when you think of it as rich vs poor as opposed to left vs right.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly, after Republicans refused to vote for a SC nominee for nearly an entire year, this just feels insignificant.

        • tehfishman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your argument appears to be that because they’ve done something in the past that you perceive to be worse, continuing misdeeds are no big deal. I don’t think you’ll find many people who will agree with that.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s not many people on here that are willing to hear “the other side isn’t behaving unreasonable in this one instance” about any issue.

            I’m fairly progressive, but the amount of “⬆️:us ⬇️:them” on this site is pretty stupid.

            • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re the lowest of the low, a genuine bootlicker. You’re a coward and conspirator with Epstein.

                • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Wow, I might have found the most neurotic person on Lemmy. It was fun reading all those comments, fully grasping your mental gymnastics. So, yes, echo chambers can be common on social media, but it may also be just as common to accuse through a mirror. I must ask you, personally, what kind of political environment are you surrounding yourself with that excuses the GOP and likens its actions to Dems? As a bonus question, what’s your opinion on Bernie Sanders?

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            people are dumb and need to know they are dumb

            This is what I’m talking about.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                You can express yourself without being hostile. You don’t make this place better by being that way. This isn’t Reddit.

                • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Informing dumb people that they are dumb is not hostile. It’s matter of fact. If someone is short telling them so is easy because it is objectively easier to express. When people are dumb it’s not. They tend to think they aren’t.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        My opinion is different than yours and you’re too close minded to recognize that.