What was I wrong about?

No, you won’t admit it. You’ll continue to oppose Schumer at all times and in all circumstances even when he does the thing you say you want him to do.

Any examples? I’ve seen them threaten to ignore court rulings but I don’t think they actually have, yet. They were forced to fund SNAP for November and to bring back the guy from El Salvador, drawing a blank on his name, Brega-Garcia?

No, Vance, the shutdown doesn’t mean you get to ignore the judiciary.

The post-covid economic recovery was relatively strong under Biden. Biden had double the job growth Trump did in his first turn. What metrics are you using to back that claim?

You know what did just start? Trump’s ruinous economic policies, the ones you’re currently excusing.

but if you ask me Biden is just a Republican anyway.

This shit has to fucking stop.

Go back 30 or 50 years and he would be a Republican.

Oh, so he’s a Republican from 5 decades ago? I thought he was a Republican right now.

“It’s a Halloween party,” the official said. “We aren’t supposed to celebrate Halloween?”

Kind of avoiding the main point of the criticism there.

Who are you gonna believe, Dear Leader or your own lying eyes?

When that doesn’t happen, I bet you won’t be admitting you were wrong.

A number of comments in here point out how this is a good move. Worst case scenario, the government opens with Dems getting what they wanted. Best case, Republicans predictably reject it and take on more of the negative image associated with prolonging the shut down.

Calling Schumer a “traitor” over this is mindless, knee-jerk nonsense.

Forcing the Republicans to shoot this down only makes Republicans look worse.

Top comment in this thread is doing just that.

So Schumer trying to end the shutdown without sacrificing affordable healthcare is him being “bought and paid for” how exactly?

Podcast hosts aren’t really any more “journalist” than the “elite” media, whatever that is. Just an excuse to give a no-name author of a very biased podcast that wouldn’t be caught dead ever acknowledging a positive thing about Democrats. Some of these articles are just saying “he won, let’s see how it goes” and this dude is twisting that using boogeyman language like “elite”.

Another person taking the recent elections as wins over Democrats, not over Republicans.

No matter how many people are on either side of the issue, gun manufacturers always win.

Palliative is essentially “we can’t do anything, we’ll make you comfortable”. It is NOT used for someone expecting to recover. I’m not why you think “hospice” nd “palliative” are mutually exclusive.

We are in this position

Because we didn’t vote for Harris like we did Biden.

he could smell mustard and onions.

the horror…

Imagine being the cop on the stand talking about the smell of onions and a light stain on his shirt acting like he just came back from 'Nam. Fucking embarrassing.

I didn’t theorize anything though. I told you why I, personally, hit that downvote button.

Let’s not be dishonest here. You spoke for more than just yourself. You used the word “anyone”, for fuck’s sake.

You’re completely ignoring what I said. I’ve been called “delusional” for merely stating the elections prove a varied approach is necessary, depending on locality. A single word insult, it has a bunch of upvotes. I think the reason you quite clearly deliberately chose to ignore this is that you know if demolishes your theory. And yes, that theory you proposed was worded to encompass more than yourself.

I think it’s probably contextual, the single word insults might fit better with the thread they’re in.

I think you’re making baseless assumptions rather than admit maybe you were wrong. I’ve been called “delusional” for merely saying the elections prove a varied approach is needed based on locality.

How convenient that you get to make a correlation based on “probably”. You just invented the context to try win some argument? I’d rather be outright insulted.