The legislation takes aim directly at trans individuals using the restroom or locker rooms, threatening those who “knowingly” and “willfully” enter facilities designated for the “opposite biological sex” with prison time. A first offense would count as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail. Those caught using the bathroom in repeated offenses, however, could be convicted as felons and face up to five years in prison.

It’ll be interesting to see how this aligns with the Full Faith and Credit clause for someone who updates their birth certificate from another state that allows for that then uses the bathroom that aligns with said certificate.

  • PunchingBag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I live in Idaho, and the comments here are as ignorant as ever.

    If you are trans/different/nonconservative in any way, let me say this very, very clearly:

    THEY WANT YOU DEAD.

    Not in prison, not a slave, not a member of society at all.

    They want you DEAD.

    Stop pussyfooting around this. Passing laws like this is merely a step towards their true goals. I am not being melodramatic, I cannot ring the warning bell hard enough after the conversations I have had with conservatives here. They are doing everything they can to slow-burn us into massacring our own people and even WANTING to think the best of these bad-faith psychos is bad FOR US ALL including THEM. They are essentially children that have been taught that having any moral code is weakness and that lying and cheating is strength. They do NOT have positive intentions and they ARE thinking about the long game. You will not convince them of anything using just words and arguments, not unless you find a way to put a LOT of money in their pockets, and you would have to first convince them that Trump didn’t already do exactly that.

    • null@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      4 days ago

      Give the kid a rest, will ya? He’s already had it up to his neck in gun violence.

  • 7112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    You are loved. You are fine the way you are. The world has a place for you. You are not alone.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 days ago

      I know Idaho is bleak right now but there are many areas much more accepting than Idaho.

      It’s hard but I strongly encourage moving somewhere more blue. As someone that lives in a blue stronghold the cults is much more accepting than these places.

      • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        Boise isn’t down for the count yet. Last year when the state started coming after Pride flags on government property the Mayor and City Council adopted the Pride flag as our city flag. The state legislature has been trying to figure out how to override that ever since. We ran the Hammerskins out of town when they tried to have a music festival, we’ve put MAGAt business owners out of business, we’ve got a lot of teachers and librarians operating malicious compliance to the anti-woke mandates, and I’ve seen more than a few bigots get their teeth knocked out and heads stomped. They might have taken over our state but they haven’t taken over our city.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          Moscow Idaho is also still holding out for a bit longer. Lots of trans people going there as a stepping stone to get to Seattle, it’s got Inland Oasis running pride and drag events and doing a lot of work making queer spaces. It is currently being literally invaded by christo fascists so I worry it’s a matter of time but for now at least it’s still a decent place (especially compared to most other parts of Idaho though I know that bar is so low you’d need a shovel to find it). I wish Boise all the best in their resistance

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are love
      You are not alone
      You are going through hell, but keep going
      Be proud, be open
      Be loud, be hopeful
      Be healthy, be happy
      Be kind to yourself
      Be decisive
      Here, now
      Do not live every day as if it is your last
      Live every day as if it is your first
      Full of wonder and excitement
      As you wonder along, excited
      Marveling at the possibilities of all that stands before you
      Here, now

      https://youtu.be/BypJJCsNKdA

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 days ago

    We need seperate bathrooms for MAGA, I don’t feel comfortable sharing a bathroom with them as they are peeping toms and pedophile supporters.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 days ago

    I cant wait for all the CIS conservatives who inevitably get arrested/genital inspected due to this law, and the inevitable crying of “It wasnt supposed to affect me, I feel so humiliated and attacked over this egregious invasion of my body” with zero self awareness or irony.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m scared of laws like this because I’m a cis woman and I have natural facial hair

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        Laws like this always put non-conservative-traditional women in the crosshairs. Moreso than trans people, despite specifically attacking trans people, simply due to how many more CIS people there are than trans.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          The goal is far greater than that. Cis people, and especially cis women, are going to be deliberately caught up in this, not accidentally. Once the sheep have been convinced that trans people are irredeemably evil, watch as the definition of “trans” expands ever-outward. Are you a woman that wears pants? That sounds like cross-dressing to me. Oh, you want to work a job like engineering? Learn to appreciate your biological sex, you transgender freak! Stop pretending to be a man and get a career appropriate to your biological sex.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I cant wait for all the CIS conservatives who inevitably get arrested/genital inspected

      The way these organizations operate, you tend to have coordinated groups of TERF brownshirts barging into public spaces and harassing strangers with the support of the church, the majority party, and law enforcement.

      If a few Republican lay-voters get swept up in the dragnet, who cares? Idaho is one of the reddest states in the country. Nobody is going to shed a tear for the 6’ tall post-menopausal country mama who gets pepper sprayed by a crack team of transvestigators, because they’ll just relabel her as Far-Left when she objects to rough treatment.

      The point of these pogroms is to juice up the partisan insiders and ready them for a wider conflict. A bit of friendly fire is a small price to pay for the libidinal joy of violently oppressing your neighbors, while getting tons of updoots on social media.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    A felony? LOL

    I wonder if they are smart enough to put exceptions in for children where the father or mother may possibly take the child into the ‘wrong’ bathroom.

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    Do they include a definition of “biological sex”? And of how that’s going to be determined?

    Of course not. They have no fucking clue what they’re talking about. They just want to hurt people

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        If it comes up in court, I guess they’ll be forced to specify if they’re defining biological sex by chromosomes, genitalia, or some other biological feature. Unfortunately, the law was made by people who are completely oblivious to the complexity of biological sex. This is why people shouldn’t be allowed to make laws without knowing the science if these things. Same thing with anti-abortion laws being made by people who don’t understand biology

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The people making this law have no idea that there are people who are biologically intersex and, if told, will dismiss it as irrelevant because they’re “a tiny minority”. Deaf people are also a small minority and it’s common practice to accommodate them. All people should be considered when making a law with the threat of jail time.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think it’s even more than just people who would be classified as intersex

        There are various markers for sex: DNA*, hormonal levels/profile, gonadal tissue, gametes, the shape of the genitals, and even the shape of the skeleton. Probably more that I’m just not bringing to mind right now

        And it would be pretty unusual for any one individual to have all of those markers point unambiguously in one direction

        So the first question is - if it’s going to be law that people have to be divided into two precise categories according to their biological sex, what marker is being used to determine which category they fit in

        If pressed on this, transphobes often default to gametes, with a fudge to the effect that people who don’t produce gametes should be judged by what gametes they would produce if their reproductive systems were producing gametes

        Okay, so, someone goes into one public toilet. Someone calls the police on them because they don’t think they’re a biological match. The police turn up…how are they going to determine what gametes that individual would produce if they produced gametes?

        Because you can’t just select a marker and not have a test to determine who fits where, can you?

        Which means, logically, what are we looking at? Genital inspections. Because that’s realisically the only test which can be administered

        So does this law have an exception for children? Or are they enshrining in law that it’s okay for adults to force children to show them their genitals? To protect kids, of course. There’s no possible way that could have any negative consequences

        But even that’s not the point, really, horrible and disgusting though it is. The point is that they don’t know and haven’t thought about what they actually mean when they use those terms, and they certainly haven’t thought about the actual consequences of the law

        There’s basically two options - unthinking transphobia, or “I don’t actually care about this issue, but I’m making a big deal of it because I’m otherwise unelectable and if I can make people worried about ‘for the children!’ and paint the other side as paedophiles I might get elected again even by people who disagree with me on literally everything else”

        And trans people suffer and are put in danger in the short-term, as do cis people who don’t fit into whatever narrow prejudices the general public have about gender expectations, and children of whatever sex/gender are put in danger in the slightly longer-term

        *which in and of itself is a lot more complicated and nuanced than just X/Y

        • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was recently listening to a video of a call-in show where someone called in and made this argument that sex should be defined by what gametes they’re “supposed to” produce. Supposed by who? The host said that’s not science, that’s fortune telling. Someone in the comments said they were an intersex chimera (male and female twins fused together in the womb) so which sex were they “supposed to” be?

          I am, as far as I know, a cisgender woman. Though I’ve never actually had my chromosomes tested. But I have facial hair, a secondary sex characteristic normally associated with men. If I don’t trim or shave regularly, I get a full beard. People who see me in public probably assume I’m trans. When I use public bathrooms, I fear being attacked because I’m mistaken for trans. Fortunately, that doesn’t seem to happen in my area. If I were in Idaho, would I now have to carry my birth certificate to prove I’m female? Would I have to have my genitals inspected? Would I have to go to court and prove I’m female?

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      They sent two or three missiles in the school. It was a double-tap strike meant to maximize casualties. Some reports say it was a triple-tap.

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oooh! Oooh! I remember this one!

    Next, businesses will have to create a separate restroom that says “TRANS ONLY” so things can be “separate but equal”…

    ಠ_ಠ

      • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        And giving them no where to feel comfortable in public is the entire point. Giving them their own washroom would be a short step in the right direction from the depraved place we’re in.

        • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, Jim Crow was a compromise already. I think benchs, restaurant tables, bathrooms were non-existent generally for African Americans in the South.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would be weirdly fine with a trans bathroom as long as cis people genuinely can’t enter it… We would keep that shit immaculate and safe. Tiny little safe space with sinks and mirrors and toiletries and supportive allies anywhere you go.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Except now you have a situation where armed individuals who masturbate to the 2nd amendment will wait idly by the TRANS ONLY bathroom for someone to walk out of it, murder the person who walked out of it, and say they feared for their lives because they tried to “groom them”.

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          At least in that situation the Trans person/people could reasonably expect the business/establishment to be an ally. That’s assuming there is no law that says there has to be a Trans only bathroom, any place which installs one would probably only be doing that because they’re an ally or Trans themselves. Now what your describing happening to businesses/establishments which are supportive of Trans people I can totally see happening.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 days ago

    We allow our pet dogs to piss anywhere. Yet if you can’t find a “public” bathroom, or find some business to buy a pack of gum for 25c, in order to be a customer to use their restroom, and you piss in an alley around the corner, you face charges like indecent exposure. All because you had to do some very basic natural function but society had placed obstacles and then labels you a criminal. Yet somehow everyone is so goddamn concerned over which bathroom you use.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      The U.S. constitution is so old that the writers didn’t see it being a problem (presumably) to not have an explicit right to bodily autonomy.

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        didn’t see it being a problem (presumably) to not have an explicit right to bodily autonomy.

        I mean, the bulk of them did own other human beings as property…

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Brother I hate to be the bearer of bad news

        John Adams’s wife, Abigail, wrote him a letter when he was off with the boys at the Continental Congress. She was picking a bone about the lack of protections given to women from their husbands and likened the relationship to that of the colonies and Britain. She was suggesting women should be codified to have more rights. He wrote back something like, “As to your extraordinary code of laws, I cannot but laugh.”

        The founding fathers were just as misogynistic as any MAGA fuckhead.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ah, those will be felonies too. The point is to make it illegal to exist if you’re trans. And the point of that is cruelty, an insatiable need that Republicans have.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 days ago

        In future MAGAmeriKKKa, we will be a nation of laws, and we will have many more laws than today, and they will be punished harshly. Those who violate the law will be incarcerated in one of the detainment centers being constructed at this moment. Then they will be leased out to corporations as Federal 13th Amendment work Slaves.