• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s a significant lack of excitement for “90210 in space” in this thread, so I’m gonna try to defend the idea.

      It sounds kind of fun, to me. I liked NuTrek, though. The part of NuTrek I disliked was it’s snap back to status-quo before the end of the first film.

      Seeing inexperienced cadets do cool space stuff, I’m down for.

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        My biggest concern is with the new ownership. The lack of any announced queer rep, SNW’s tepid third season, and even the pointed heteronormative attire in this poster all seem in line with a Trek that’s not going to push for anything progressive.

        I agree with you that a Star Trek teen drama has potential though. Star Trek was built to encompass a variety of genres. Most around here seem to have appreciated the Star Trek animated comedy, and I don’t hear much denigrating of Bakula’s West Wing in space proposal, so I don’t see why 90210 in space should be such a punchline.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    To be fair, it wouldn’t be the first time a Trek premiere’s promotional image looked like a poorly-done bag of ass evoking the general garbage stylings of the era.

    1966 TV Guide ad for the original "Star Trek" premiere. Lumpy-faced illustrations of Kirk and Spock flank a drawing of the Enterprise zooming past on a flaming rocket fire trail. The ad contains the text "Welcome aboard the United Space Ship Enterprise. Where it goes, no program has gone before... starring William Shatner as Capt. James T. Kirk (Earthman). Co-starring Leonard Nimoy as Science Officer Spock (from the planet Vulcan)"

    1987 TV Guide ad for the premiere of "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Really sloppy airbrushed wet-looking illustrations of the TNG crew with expressions ranging from blank to befuddled are lined up across the page while the Enterprise D zooms past leaving another weird streaming contrail behind it. The text reads, "Tonight, the 24th Century begins with a spectacular two-hour movie."

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      1987 TV Guide ad for the premiere of "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Really sloppy airbrushed wet-looking illustrations of the TNG crew with expressions ranging from blank to befuddled are lined up across the page while the Enterprise D zooms past leaving another weird streaming contrail behind it. The text reads, "Tonight, the 24th Century begins with a spectacular two-hour movie."

      I can’t help but still feel excited for this premier, from this ad. Maybe they knew it didn’t matter how they presented it, haha.

      Also, they really underestimated Marina Sirtis’ impact on the series, based on her placement here.

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        They also overestimated Wesley’s crew commission. By rights he should be wearing one of his hideous Season 1 sweaters.

  • Bobo The Great@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Please don’t make it a generic US high school drama. There’s already enough US-defaultism in Star Trek.

    Also, the image is glossy, it feels like AI generated

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    As long as the Ellison’s control Star Trek it will never have a return to form. So this will be as bland as SNW S3 was when Fascism is taking hold all over the world. I feel classic Trek would have something to say about that.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I debated coming in here and saying I wasn’t going to watch this due to Paramount and Ellison, but I decided I wouldn’t. But now here I am, saying it.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Make Captain Pike kiss a trans woman damnit. Make a fucken statement! It matters that our media does this.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Paramount: We need to ensure this new show attracts as many people as possible while maintaining a strong identity of Star Trek. How can we hit those points with the Ad campaign?

    Marketing: Well our focus groups are saying that a lot of Star Trek fans are still yearning for something closer to the aesthetic of 1990’s Star Trek

    Paramount: I zoned out there for a bit but I did hear aesthetic of 1990’s. Make that the core of advertising!

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not even that, it’s the feeling we had when it was the 90s/00s and the good Star Treks were new…ish

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s not even that, it’s Avery Brooke’s powerful voice and Patrick Stewart’s piercing eyes as they confront one another for the first time, the briefing room filling with tension as Sisko’s barely contained rage breaks against Picard’s steely reserve, knowing both are just surface defences covering the hidden hurt they reach feel, both victims of the same implacable foe, both denying themselves the comfort of…

          We’re all nostalgic for the same things here, right? Yes? No?

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m as fatigued with bad Star Trek as I am with bad Star Wars now.

    I’m honestly not excited to hear of any new Star Trek until they have a major change to show runners, or enough people who enjoy classic and 90s Trek come out and say, “oh wait this new one is great”.

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not for us anymore, friend. They’ll milk the franchises we love until they’re just a husk, then dump it. Some upstart may revive it, but then it just gets put back into the cycle.

      Welcome to pure greed capitalism; fuck you, pay me. Tomorrow is the next asshole’s problem.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Given the time period it was made (ie, now) it’s entirely possible there was some artist who was ordered by a manager to use more AI in their work and was forced to edit the output to try to make it look less like shit.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s just a lot of HDR processing. You get this when you extend curves to maximize range and then crank the vibrancy and definition sliders to the top.

      it looks like AI because the older Stable Diffusion models had flaws that caused them to prioritize vibrancy instead of realism.