I think anyone who works for a big company, or at least most who do, will have experienced going to meetings that should’ve been e-mails?

Some of those probably shouldn’t have even been that. Like, for instance, yesterday’s all-departments show-and-tell meeting, where literally no departments had anything new to show.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I really appreciate it when colleagues check in right before a meeting via chat just to make sure at least one person has something they actually need to talk about. If not, we skip it and go back to our work. Some teams do this as a habit, others meet anyway just to shoot the shit if there’s nothing work-related to discuss. My team is the former, thankfully.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      We have some recurring meetings where team members are expected to add discussion topics to a doc beforehand. If nobody does the meeting gets cancelled, it’s great.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Damn, where do you hire your middle management? My company’s management needs those meetings to feel like they have a job.

        At least since I work remotely, I can mostly keep working while listening in.

      • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yep, this is one of those meetings, except the “doc” is an admin’s e-mail address, and we don’t find out what’s on the agenda until we turn up.

        I suspect it’s job security for the admin, and it’s half an hour a week I don’t have to break down pallets, so I’m ok with it.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      others meet anyway just to shoot the shit

      Hey now. Shooting the shit is how we test our mics before the meeting. If you can’t make the pre-meeting, then suffer and never know whether your mic is shit.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve heard this in a podcast and the same principle applies at work:

    Most books should have been short essays, most essays should have been pamphlets, most pamphlets should have been blog posts, most blog posts should have been tweets, most tweets shouldn’t exist.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    We had a reorg about a year and a half ago. Before that, there was an app team, a web team and a backend team. Now there’s a webshop team and a website team, each containing app, web and backend people.

    The web and app people have been complaining that whenever people from the other product talk about in daily doesn’t matter to them. That wastes 5 minutes a day of their time. So we had 4 retrospectives, 4 workshops and 3 discussion meetings on how to restructure the dailies to save time during daily. That’s about as much time as would be wasted over the course of maybe 200 dailies. We still don’t have a decent plan. The current idea is to split the dailies and have two dailies, and everyone who is not web or app (so backend, testers, product owner, team manager and UX designers) need to be in both dailies where all the announcements will be repeated twice.

    We apparently don’t have bigger issues.

    (And there’s me, backender, sitting there listening to both web and app people chatting away for 10 minutes a day about things like accessibility and layouting that really don’t matter for me, just barely listening in case someone mentions my name, so I can quickly scramble and act as if I was following along what they were saying.)

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It sure is. But as a backend dev I have no part of my code that has anything to do with accessibility. It doesn’t touch my work in any way. Nothing I do will make the app that I don’t work on more or less accessible.

        Office supplies are also pretty important and I personally also do benefit from them. But still it would not be very helpful to me or anyone else if I, as a software developer, attend a daily meeting on restocking office supplies.

        (Not sure if you have a software development background or not, just in case you don’t: Software is usually split into backend and frontend. Frontend are e.g. apps and website, backend are the servers. Stuff like user interface, user experience and accessibility are firmly frontend things, while the backend supplies business data to the frontends, e.g. user account information, order history, product listings and so on. You could say the backend is responsible for “what” to dislay and the frontend is responsible for “how” to display stuff. Stuff like user interface, user experience or accessibility are firmly frontend topics and backend has nothing to do with them.)

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    That’s why I support WhatsApp work groupchats! Sometimes it just requires a message and a little ❤️/👍 emoji reaction to confirm you’ve read it.

  • razorcandy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Good management is supposed to protect you from pointless meetings. Unfortunately some meetings only seem to exist so that management can say they have done something.