For others wondering, stated reason is “cultural”.

claiming in a lawsuit that withholding the polarizing yeast-based spread breaches his human right to “enjoy his culture as an Australian.”

Hopefully a good therapist or friend would tell you. Or some self reflection and maturity growth over time.

Maybe to a point? But also if you feel everyone’s treating you poorly, it might be something about you (inability to set boundaries for example).

I think Fry would be kind of annoying too.

This is what reading East of Eden has been like so far.

Shouldn’t “worm” replace “man” in “Samantha”? If we’re incorporating our species into our names.

With the same system in place I don’t think changing the people involved will make a huge difference. We’ve got to dismantle the whole thing and start from scratch. And with a new system there will naturally be a different type of people interested and involved.

Scientists know which one is better and the last time a bill was presented in Congress it was actually the wrong one.

I thought reading it as anything other than sexual innuendo is a stretch. How would he know how many exited. I also imagine the same kind of person who would shoot someone unarmed 7 times and brag about it is also the kind of psychopath who would try to make an ill-attempted sexual innuendo about it.

I just wouldn’t rule it out and I don’t think he deserves the benefit of the doubt here.

Or even from a brain back to itself. Doesn’t even have to be consumed by other brains for it to be art.

I can’t believe I’m saying this: Just because you’re sexually attracted to bees doesn’t mean You have to fuck then.