• sbrodolino21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not really, I provided some examples to some other user where they were clearly “centrists”. There were people who leaned more on both sides and the advancement was achieved by someone who was more moderate.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      None of those advances were made with a minority of support in society. Is the argument that the populace has since become more conservative?

      I think what’s more likely is that people you’d consider “centrist” backed those changes. You’re dead set on characterizing this “centrist” entity that you have only vaguely defined to create an enemy that doesn’t exist.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Don’t be dishonest, you did more than that. The enemy you’re creating is the “evil centrist”. Your own example does not support that simplistic view.

          Achievements like Civil Rights didn’t come about because just a small part of the “left” pushed for it. It came about because the majority of the left stood for it. So no, you don’t get to take all the credit and YES, you’re splitting the party for no discernable reason.