• WakeyWakey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m a leather craftsman, the majority of hides used in the industry are from cattles animals destined to meat consumption. Which means that skin is a by-product of our meat usage and would be destroyed if we didn’t use it elsewhere, like making bags and all. The only animals that are killed only for their skin are the “exotic” ones, like snakes, crocodiles, frogs, … etc. Which for me is kind of sad to see.

    I’m excluding fur from all of this.

    • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I mean we need to reduce our meat consumption anyway, especially beef for climate change and land/water use reasons, so it would be nice to have a leather backup once the current supply of beef cattle starts to dry up.

  • kingofras@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    The only thing I’m interested in is the energy required to produce one kilo of each type, the cow’s lifetime methane emissions and the labs CO2 emissions.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    FFS…lab grown meat, lab grown cow skin cells, they all grow being fed fetal bovine serum, which is not taken by donation.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      So? How many die in those vs traditional methods? Why pretend to care about harm reduction and then shit on tech that could reduce it?