MicroWave@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoBBC ‘100% fake news’, says Donald Trump’s press secretarywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1325arrow-down12
arrow-up1323arrow-down1external-linkBBC ‘100% fake news’, says Donald Trump’s press secretarywww.theguardian.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squareRampantParanoia2365@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 hours agoNutrition Label…? Is that just a cute name for the full details?
minus-squareRoidingOldMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·13 hours agoYou’re not measuring by what percentage of Trump stories are positive/negative, the only metric that matters to him.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down18·13 hours agoThis just begs the question of who “Newsguard” is and why anyone should trust them. There’s dozens of conservative sites that do these ratings for right wing crap and give them high scores, too.
minus-squaresnooggums@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down1·13 hours agoThey have an About page that links to who they are and the criteria they use. Just because conservatives have a shitty evil version doesn’t mean every rating is untrustworthy.
Nutrition Label…? Is that just a cute name for the full details?
You’re not measuring by what percentage of Trump stories are positive/negative, the only metric that matters to him.
This just begs the question of who “Newsguard” is and why anyone should trust them.
There’s dozens of conservative sites that do these ratings for right wing crap and give them high scores, too.
They have an About page that links to who they are and the criteria they use.
Just because conservatives have a shitty evil version doesn’t mean every rating is untrustworthy.