The fact that one of the provisions is that the Republicans will follow existing law by paying furloughed staff is a massive red flag even if everything else is ignored.
Good job trading something already required for everyone else’s healthcare Schumer!
Kinda adds to the humor tbh.
That is if Trump doesn’t bother vetoing anything that is a compromise with the Dems right off the bat.
Schumer is just offering to lube up the general public again.
This past spring, right?
Yeah, this the same old Schumer compromise ratcheting everything to the right
Yeah, worked out really well when he caved this spring so we could force the debate during the current elections so he can cave again to push it off to next year’s elections.
Totally not kicking the can down the road.
They just backstabbed someone running for mayor…
In a statement to PEOPLE, Zhou said she had been “frauded by love”
As more details comes out the more Zhou’s wording sounds like a jilted lover who is overreacting to a failed relationship.
Addressing Zhou’s allegations that Renner threatened to call ICE on her, Singer alleges Zhou “had been relentlessly harassing and threatening my client with hundreds of unsolicited and unwanted messages.”
Singer knows that he will potentially need to prove evidence if this goes to court, so yeah it seems more and more like a jilted lover. That isn’t to say Renner didn’t do anything wrong, but that it is very likely that it wasn’t anything like the accusations being thrown around.
The fact that they train on all available data and are still wrong 45% of the time shows there is zero chance of LLMs ever being an authoritative source of factual knowledge with their current approach
The biggest problem with the current LLM approach is NOT limiting the data set to factual knowledge instead of mashing it in with meme subreddits.
I am 100% aware of all the benefits.
Also, like the priest/lawyer/etc. there is an exception to the privilege if the spouse is an participant in crime.
But Barrett has suggested recently that same-sex marriage might be in a different category than abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and had children.
Or, you know, because people should be able to choose who they marry. Wait, that actually applies to deciding whether to have children too!
They are similar, but she has the logic backwards. People should be able to marry who they want and have abortions because people should be able to choose for themselves.
Yeah, but it wouldn’t be handled by the police anywhere close to a woman who is just topless and not doing anything extra.
Behave the same way you would with clothes on. Just do things like tending a garden or talking to neighbors.
Think about it this way: Some guys like their nipples played with and can rub their nipples in public without getting any real attention unless they do it towards kids or something. Why is a bare nipple on a woman automatically sexual just because it is exposed? It isn’t automatically sexual despite a bunch of prudes assuming it is.
Yes, it is absurdist humor and apparently not for you.
One more time: Not all sacrificial offerings are personal sacrifices.
The possum wasn’t rewarded because they didn’t choose to be hit by the car.
“Stop feeding the poor!”
That movie seemed to equate taking everything literally with being a moron. Like even the literal interactions came across as being stupid.
Schumer caved in the spring.
Schumer started the negotiating last week by offering a milquetoast request to have a vote for one fucking year extension instead of making it permanent. These fucks who are committed are just doubling down on his shitty compromising and it absolutely looks like he is just trying to save face.