• Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This will die in court. The “red tape elimination” they did will simply result in an unending string of lawsuits.

  • Mavvik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why do we keep putting billions of dollars into a dying industry? We literally just bought a pipeline, we dont need more. I really hate this country sometimes.

    • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What part of it is dying? The demand for natural gas, keeps going up. We literally had two countries come to us when Russia shut down their gas lines, asking us to supply them and our (not so smart) PM at the time not only said no, but that there was ‘no business case’ for shipping more gas. Im pretty sure when there’s a customer knocking on your shop door asking when you’re gonna open up that there’s a business case.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You are right, but their is no future for it. Combustibles need to be eliminated from our energy markets. They are harming us and the entire planet we need to live. Huge expense for small time gains is bad leadership. If the markets were nationalized, I would be more excited to get more to market, even with what I said. It is not. We don’t need to help foreign entities take our resources faster for a pittance in tax benefits. Fuck that noise.

        • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          If a cold country is asking for our gas, especially to eliminate dependence on a hostile foreign regime, that is definitely a worldwide improvement and harm reduction for millions of people. Its wishful thinking to say ‘eliminate it’ but thats not going to happen overnight, if ever, in some countries. If we have the resource NOW and they need it NOW, then its in their best interest AND ours to sell it to them now.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        As Marx said, “A capitalist will sell you the rope to hang him with.” You’re argument is only valid if you believe anthropogenic global warming isn’t real. If it is, and all the science indicates it is, then the business case is only valid in the short term, with massive penalties in 15 to 40 years.

        Businesses make decisions based on the next quarter. Countries tend to have to look at the next decade.

        • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          Well, to be honest I think anthropogenic global warming is only half real. I used to live on Hawaii island and during the massive lava flow of 2018 it inundated my side of the island and I watched literally BILLIONS of gallons of lava, ash and volcanic gasses spew out of multiple vents for 3.5 months. That volcano has been continuously erupting for nearly 35 years and it recently has been spewing massive volumes again.

          Kilauea volcano is part of the Ring of Fire - about 40,000 km long and up to about 500 km wide, and contains about 750 volcanoes. I have a very hard time believing that my little put put car is what’s causing most of global warming when I have witnessed the incredible volume of gas coming out of the earth.

    • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      He is and is still our best option until we push for election reform to introduce ranked choice and proportional representation. Lest we get forever stuck with Neo-liberals tilting ever closer to Nuremberg rejects.

      • Sunshine (she/her)@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Nope, he played on the fearmongering of a PP government. We need more regional parties to break the 2-party grip on Canadians.

        • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          He fearmongered far more on the ‘threat’ of Trump. That was the main point of his campaign and people actually believed that the US might invade Canada during the campaign. Its amazing what people will fall for - totally ignoring the fact that Trump is blustering loudmouth who will say anything as long as it gets him attention.

        • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          And exactly how do you get that in the current system we have without reform? I’m not saying he’s good I’m saying that if we try to keep doing this same song and dance without reform, we’re fools.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No he’s not! He’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He’s one of the most conservative neo-liberal leader the Liberal Party of Canada ever had yet. He’s our worst option because he looks and talks like a Liberal, but acts like a Conservative and people don’t realize it.

        His budget is going to fuck Canadians over further even worst than in the Mulroney era.

        • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Okay, then what’s the realistic better option? To be clear I’m not saying he’s doing a good job, I’m just concerned that if you try to push people away from voting for the lesser of two evils you may just end up with the greater one as seen in the United States’ recent best hits.

          Which is why I think election reform is our best bet at getting something better.

          • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            NDP. They’re the better option. And we have minority governments here. Even if the conservatives had won as a minority, having a strong NDP to oppose them and require compromises would have been better. A budget like the one Carney presented wouldn’t have passed.

            • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              60 minutes ago

              Yes but I said realistic. NDP won’t happen with our current system, much better chance with election reform.

    • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So, block the main income producer in western Canada, so that the province that imports its oil and gas from other countries and has an abundance of hydroelectric as IT’S main natural resource can be happy?

      Yup, that’s exactly the kind of attitude that has made western Canada so resentful. Especially when we know we’re sending that ‘blocking’ province 14 billion a year out of the revenues of the resource they love to block. Make it make sense.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You mean, the same industry that’s behind all the global warming related climate catastrophies that we’ve been facing year over year and responsible for Canadian forests burning from East to West year over year for the past 3 years??? Thar industry? The one that we’re supposed to ramp down production to use alternative energies that are less impactful on the environment?

        Maybe they should invest in other industries like green energy or other more sustainable industries.

        • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You know that global climate change is actually GLOBAL, right? So 98.5% of the planet’s emissions do not come from Canada. And of the tiny amount that does, its less than half coming from oil and gas. That 0.7% is a rounding error in a computation that greatly depends on what’s input.

          Canada’s O and G sector is NOT the great demon you’re making it out to be - it’s barely a factor in climate change. If you REALLY want to make a change, chase the countries who are major polluters - China and the US - you know, the two places that produce almost ALL the goods you buy and consume. Start with boycotting all your purchases from those two countries and I’ll believe you actually care about climate change.