How do you know that?

A fucking joke, that’s what you are

We should be grateful for every vegan trying to save animals/planet/… and generally leading their life in a way that does not fuck up everything for everyone else.

For every “annoying vegan” there are 100 annoying non-vegans complaining about them on the internet

Grab 'em by the pissy

Hm, maybe the reference was not clear or maybe it was and we’re stuck in layers of implied references:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly10r6m_-n8

Do you guys not have phones?

Switching from two-party systems to multi-party systems is not going to solve your problems. Likewise, switching from multi-party to two-party won’t either. If you took the time to watch the lecture you would understand that.

There seems to be this naive believe here on lemmy that the two-party system in places like the UK or US is what causes all the trouble and lack of representation. Having lived in multi-party and basically one-party systems I can tell you that this does not make politics more representative.

As long as the general public ™ has no believable leverage that politicians need to take into account while billionaires buy all the media, give politicians exit options and do all sorts of other things, there will never be money for schools or hospitals and always an urgent need to reduce regulations/taxes for companies. No matter if you have 1, 2, or 5 parties.

Here we go, I knew I had posted it already here on lemmy a while ago because this crap comes up again and again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3-VlQu3iRM

I think this is the better source and has a more thorough argumentations for and against both two- and multi-party systems (I think around lecture 8-10). But I can’t expect a common lemmy troll to watch something like this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDqvzFY72mg&list=PLh9mgdi4rNeyViG2ar68jkgEi4y6doNZy&index=1

Lol no that’s not what happens :D I don’t know on which planet you follow politics

Easier said than done though. If the results are non-significant, that can be due to all sorts of things only one of them being a lack of an actual effect. If your measure is bad/noisy/not well calibrated, your research plan has flaws etc., the sample is too small, … Most non-significant results are due to bad research and it’s hard to identify the other ones. Preregistration and registered reports are some ideas to change that

Multi-party systems have their own issues. For example, whatever a party says they will do if you vote for them is worth nothing after the election. They have to find coalition partners and everything is up for negotiation.

Satire becomes the new way to roll a business. We’ve reached a point where this kind of post with its obviously satirical framing could as well come from an actual founder dude who just craves for maximum attention with nothing to show for it and just trying to go from there. At this point it doesn’t matter anymore if it’s satirical or not as long as it gets the clicks. Clicks turn into dollars at some point.

Not to blame lil’ Ky-Nam here, although looking at the short summary (3x Majors CS, Econ) this sounds like either the entire profile is satire or he is unseriously serious about this kind of hype business approach to just get attention and then go from there. But maybe it’s just a dude.

What a time, we can’t even discriminate the authentic crap from toxic crap anymore.

Also the arrow buttons are touched in the wrong order imho but ok

Obviously a missed opportunity here with naming