Oh please. The concern is about competition, not security.

And we should remember it was Jason Kenney who did this, not Danielle Smith. They are all the same.

The author tries hard to excuse Peter Lougheed but the fact is that it was his idea to begin with. If he thought it should require a two thirds majority then he should have fought to have that written into the Constitution. Opinions are irrelevant. The fact is that the Notwithstanding Clause exists because the premiers wanted politicians to be the ultimate arbiters of what rights and freedoms should be and not the courts. It is doing exactly what it was intended to do. I know of no other country that has a Constitution and gives politicians the ability to ignore it. I am tired of being told it’s up to voters to correct this sort of thing. No, it isn’t, for several reasons. Even if we vote down a government that abuses the Notwithstanding Clause, it will still be there and there is absolutely no guarantee it won’t be abused in the future. The Notwithstanding Clause has to be eliminated by a constitutional amendment, permanently. And that is the politicians’ responsibility, not the voters’.

Itś corruption pure and simple. They are knowingly lining the pockets of their associates with ou r tax money.

Hey, now that we have this obscene energy-wasting capability, let’s see what other ways there are to generate equally obscene profits!

Any NDP leadership candidate “might be the answer to the banker Mark Carney”.

No, they should just not be allowed to prevent their children from being vaccinated.

The conventiongoers are shills for corporations that have captured the government. Lets not kid ourselves. This is not about understanding science.

Ban them in front of schools or universities? It’s surprising how difficult the concept of freedom of expression is for some.

I am a longtime user of Linux and I am pretty normal. All the Linux users I know are also pretty normal. If there’s a Linux user that is not normal, it’s not because of Linux.

To someone who might benefit from dropping Windows for Linux, I would argue that it’s free, it’s much simpler, no one will try to sell you anything, you can let it do software updates in the background and you won’t be abetting genocide. Or billionaires.