I’m also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .

  • 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • bss03@infosec.pubtoNiceMemes@sopuli.xyzI'm down with this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think when I hit my number (so that passive income should maintain until my death), I’m not going to quit working, but begin salary-scale mutual aid / community building / charity efforts.

    But, I also think it’s cool you are living as close to outside Capitalism as possible.









  • While that may contribute to the slipperiness of ice in certain circumstances, we know that ice is still slippery even when the compressive force is unable to melt the ice, even a thin layer. For example, we’ve studied ice at temperatures and pressures where liquid water doesn’t form.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20zyW0qoSTE

    I don’t remember the details exactly, but in the (most common) crystalline arrangements of H20, at the surface/edge of ice the individual molecules don’t have all their crystalline “partners”, so they can still shift around to varying degrees, which makes ice slippery even when none of it can / does melt–all of the molecules are part of at least one crystal.


  • I found that systemd actually simplified all the things I was doing on sysvinit. BUT, I did hold out until Debian testing stopped supporting sysvinit, and I think waiting gave me a better experience.

    With X11 -> Wayland, the main thing holding me back finding a tiling compositor that will work under Plasma and is packaged for Debian and the learning at least the basics. My XMonad configuration isn’t that special, but I’m really quite used to not having to re-arrange my own windows, and being able to move/resize/refocus all with the home row and modifier keys. So, I’m probably going to wait until Debian testing ships a Plasma that doesn’t support X11, and have to do some learning then.




  • When two persons/groups choose to use the same label, it becomes harder for anyone external to differentiate them easily.

    Calling the people that confuse the two as “irrational” and bigoted isn’t going to clarify anything, and will likely cause them to assume you are not allied with them.

    Dismissing people who have concerns that those confusions might be used by bad actors is just gross naivete.

    But, certainly, restricting the political power (or human rights) of a particular based on their chosen labels–even if those labels are confusing–when they espouse tolerant views and act in tolerant ways IS bigoted.

    The closest analog I can some up with is “Catholic”. If you just use that label, I think I am justified in assuming you do not value bodily autonomy (particular of women), and are therefore not a tolerant member of society. I’d certainly welcome a “Catholic” that makes it clear they reject intolerant Catholic dogma, but the existence of tolerant "Catholic"s does make it easier for intolerant Catholics to acquire and use political power. Of course, “Muslim” and “Islam” don’t come with quite as formal an organization or consistent a dogma, so it’s even more confusing.








  • Restricting the political power (ability to run in, and win elections) of someone because they are Muslim is Islamophobic. So, I’d say this tweet is Islamophobic, since it seems to be advocating for that action.

    I understand the fear of violence from people that justify their violence in religion, particularly (but not exclusively) Islam. But, we have to be very careful with restricting political power based on mere label-sharing.