Yeah, baby brained shit. Good luck, you’re going to need it.

Mewgenics is goddamned amazing & looks like absolute shit, so, the tradition continues?

Omg this shit is ludicrous. Are you baby brained?

I don’t use pencils to draft my work (penciling). I do this intentionally b/c I am a trained printmaker & back in the day (think sixteenth century) when making intaglio prints (that means on copper plates), there was no way to erase so they etched balls-to -the-wall style, mistakes & all.

I spent a long time learning to create line art w/o using pencil b/c I wanted to create that same weird, not-quite-right look that intaglio prints have.

I’m not sure why I’m bothering explaining myself b/c I am not in the habit of doing so but, goddamn, get a fucking hobby then maybe you won’t feel so threatened by AI.

Ofc I did these people are rabid weirdos, it’s alright.

HA! Are you accusing my work of being AI? That’s fucking hilarious

Well, you are making up head cannon. Check my profile, there’s a Pixelfed link. I’m an artist not an engineer.

Like…?

I happen to agree w the developer that peoples’ problem w AI is actually a problem w Capitalism

Accountability for what!? You people have lost your minds.

Yeah I do. This is a small, volunteer, open source developer creating something for our benefit & has found a way to ease their workload but the purity brigade demands they type everything out by hand from scratch b/c they have big feels & are reflexively reactionary about AI. Seems shitty to me.

Okay. I guess you want the volunteer open source dev to write everything by hand from scratch so it will pass your high standards. That’s on you, honestly.

Lord Almighty the reactionary hate is so goddamn stupid.

They are making the point that you won’t be able to tell the difference. & It’s a salient one.

Two things, the experiment you are referring to was specifically designed to deceive whereas AI vulnerabilities would just be simple bugs.

Secondly, the security requirements of the Linux Kernel are way more important/stringent than Lutris, which has no special access & is often even further sandboxed if installed via Flatpak.

I just don’t see this as an issue until it proves to be one. People are always welcome to fork a “pure” version.

You are assuming the author is being unsafe & not auditing code for very basic security issues.

Let me present this angle, small teams of volunteer open source developers finally have a way to help ease the amount of code they produce, but you want them to continue doing all the work manually because AI hurts your feefees.

Further, you are openly declaring you don’t trust the devs to audit their own code.

If you can find a security vulnerability in the code (it is open source after all) I’ll cede, but otherwise, I think it is a good thing responsible AI use can help shoulder the work these folks do for our benefit.

Holy purity test I think people in this thread are slightly over reacting.

Why is this a shitpost? I feel like it’s a wholesome meme or whatever

“his key economic accomplishments at home” lol sure, CNN. Maybe you can list those out for us?

No, is it relevant? Help me out

EDIT: There’s a play called Waiting for Godot, but the meaning of Godot is ambiguous

Oh you mean waiting for him to reveal the big mistake? Yeah I almost mentioned that alongside the calls for action, it’s annoying, but I was already blabbling.