I am defending no one, but I do think it’s interesting that Isreal was omitted while Russian ties were highlighted. Also Isreal is the West, in the same way France is even if they have spies attempting to influence the US.

As much as he was rumored to be an Isreali spy

You’re joking… right?

You’re right, I did say that

If Democrats had a majority in both chambers of Congress, or even just one, I guarantee you things wouldn’t be as bad as they are now

So what about when they had a majority, after the last phase of constantly attacking Palestine, did they cut funding down to W Bushes level then, or did they continue funding them at roughly the same level?

You’re also forgetting that Democrats chose to not arrest Trump for known pedophilia, which likely would’ve caused enough infighting on the right to secure a win, but nah they just let him pass jail straight to Go.

“Made some effort” lol. No, they were giving you lipservice. Biden had plenty of oppurtunities to stop it but didn’t, and you want to act like that was effort. After your comment, I was going to say that the US is givng as much in 2025 as 2024, but I found something even more wild: US funding dropped from 2024 to 2025 (chart 2), lower than any year under Biden.

What you saw with Biden was someone trying to broker a peace deal

By allowing Isreal to end it every time and not putting a foot doen

openly stating on live TV that he didn’t agree with Israel’s methods

And then allowing them to simply continue

and floating arms shipment cancellations to try to bring Netanyahu to the table

But never doing it

My definition of full support of Isreal is letting them continue killing children while continuing to fund them. What you’re seeing now is Trump trying to get a slice of the pie instead of just letting Isreal eat it herself.

That one drowned in a vat, Simulacrum Prime runs the syndicate now

“I only supported some Nazis” = “I supported Nazis.”

She said she was going to keep doing what Biden was doing, which was full support of Isreal, I had no reason to doubt her.

You spelled “genocide supporter” wrong.

An official confirming it on record is not insignificant

Bold to assume there is a non-simulacrum Zuck

Gotta get good enough to throat it down then tongue the clit

You always have the worst takes

It might seem like you’re seeing one group, but you’re actually seeing two or even three. The first group are actually bots or other influencing accounts that are focused on getting people to not vote and are ones you mentioned in your first comment. The second is the group you mentioned in the comment I am replying to, they are people who recognize that the voting system is heavily entrenched with systems that are designed to make votes unheard like electoral college, gerrymandering/any form of districting, announcing winners before final counts (eg 2000 election), preventing other candidates from running, etc. Then there is a third group (which may overlap with group 2) that recognize that the slide into fascism has been constant regardless of who they vote for, as Democrats have never actually rolled back policies in any meaningful way since (at least) Nixon.

Every leftist I’ve talked to falls into one or more of the last 2 groups. They vote in every election, but recognize on a federal level it’s more symbolic than truly doing anything. I hope this provides some insight.

As an aside, you’ve been living in a “full” fascist state since the actions taken post-9/11, the PATRIOT act being a major flag.

Highly doubt you do

That quote comes from a longer quote, here’s most of it I think “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to hear about those who do not learn from history are doomed to hear about those who do not learn from history are doomed to hear about those who do not learn from history are doomed to hear about those who do not learn from history are doomed to hear about…”

Too fire; can’t handle the heat

Damn theyre censoring patahk now?

Homer practiced oral history, written 1st ed would’ve been someone else, Plato perhaps