Ordinary fucking people man, I hate em.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Even the cheapest Prosciutto is light-years ahead of whatever the fuck that Lunchables meat is made out of.
So what is the “right” way to use them?
So long as they are helping the “downtrodden”* it’s ok to see the numbers differently?
I have studied statistics. In my studies I learned that numbers do not lie, people lie. And, as was stated before, people can manipulate numbers to match their narrative.
I’ve seen studies published as “fact” just because the author manipulated the numbers to match their findings.
This is what we should base our outlook on?
*in this instance, “downtrodden” refers to the person or group deemed savable by those who are looking to be a savior.
So…statistics are only valid when they promote your ideals?
Or is it that, in your mind, the stats that don’t run parallel with your ideals have obviously been misinterpreted or fudged?
Just trying to figure out your stance on statistical data.
Quoting crime statistics based on gender:

Quoting crime statistics based on race:

I don’t know, have you seen how they are teaching math these days?
This liberal agenda is getting out of hand!! /s



Hold up…do people think that “healthcare” is a viable alternative to proper diet and exercise?
Is THAT why Americans see “healthcare” as a human right?!