What’s the pin to bust the AI bubble?
The actual trigger is when someone influential decides “this is far enough - I’m pulling my money out before it all vanishes.” This doesn’t have to be such a dire thing - investors are constantly saying “this is enough, I’ve done well in this, time to take the profits and move my money elsewhere.”
Others see the influential figure doing that and begin to get scared. Many follow. And this becomes a chain reaction when the market at large sees this trend. If it’s enough people, and there’s enough doubt looming out there, it will chain and take the entire market down. If there’s not, it will stabilize. Small corrections happen all the time.
It’s a very basic human thing. If you were in a room and everyone else in it suddenly screamed and ran away you would follow them and figure out why later.
Truly, it could be anything that unsettles the market. A bubble popping is essentially a cascading failure, where the dominos fall, when the house of cards collapses, when fear turns into panic, even when everyone is of sound mind.
The Great Depression is said to have started because of a colossally bad “short squeeze”, where investors tried to corner the market on copper futures, I think. That caused some investment firms to go broke, which then meant trust overall was shaken. And then things spiraled out of control thereafter, irrespective of whether the underlying industries were impacted or not.
So too did the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, where the USA housing market collapsed, and the extra leverage that mortgagees had against their home value worked against them, plunging both individuals and mortgage companies into financial ruin. In that situation, the fact that some people lost their homes, coupled with them losing their jobs due to receding market, was an unvirtuous cycle that fed itself.
I can’t speculate as to what will pop the current bubble, but more likely than not, it will be as equally messy as bubbles of yore. But much like the Big One – which here in California refers to another devastating earthquake to come – it’s not a question of if but when.
Until it (and the AI bubble popping) happens though, it is not within my power to do much about it, and so I’ll spend my time preparing. That doesn’t mean I’m off to move my retirement funds into S&P500 ex-AI though, since even the Dot Com bubble produced gains before it went belly up. I must reiterate that no one knows when the bubble will pop, so getting on or getting off now is a financial risk.
Preparation means to build resilience, to decouple my home from my job, to keep my family and community safe even when the shaking starts. For some, this means stocking food and water. For others, it means building mutual aid networks. And for some still, it means downsizing and making their lives more financially sustainable, before the choice is made for them.
This is a rollercoaster and we’re all strapped in, whether we like it or not.
A) “the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent”
B) The big players in AI aren’t highly leveraged. If MSFT or Nvidia have their valuations drop overnight, the consequences to them are minimal
How Money Works released a good video on this recently
The How Money Works video was decent, but I was annoyed he showed the Apple cash on hand chart without mentioning they peaked at ~100B, and the contracts we’re talking about are in hundreds of billions
Microsoft, for example, has about 100B in cash on hand. Their total liabilities have gone from about 2x their cash to 3x, which is effectively doubling the leverage
When you think about that additional debt in absolute terms, it’s huge. Historically companies wouldn’t be able to get to that level of debt simply because they lacked the cash to do so
The big players in AI aren’t highly leveraged
It’s not traditional leverage but the recent deals being announced where the AI companies are raising money from Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Google, AMD, Oracle, etc. and paying it back in stock or purchase commitments have a certain circular bootstrappy notion to them. The formulas for the valuations rely on feedback loops that are less stable and might create runaway feedback conditions at the slightest hiccup.
In any highly capital intensive business, you always run the risk that the thing you build is worth less than the cost it took to build it. And when that happens, collapses can happen pretty quickly, as everyone invested in these companies rushes towards the offramp.
I can think of a few catalysts that could trigger that initial realization that the thing made isn’t actually worth the cost to build it:
- A new model comes out from a competitor that was cheaper to build and almost as good. (Deepseek reminded everyone that this might happen.)
- New money stops coming in and the companies building things have to tighten their belts. This could be driven by a failure to monetize as much as previously modeled, so that the value of the company itself is questioned.
- Some kind of legal flaw threatens the entire foundation of some expensive models.
- Some kind of technical flaw causes one company’s flagship model to lose the race against other companies.
- Some key personnel are incapacitated in a way that robs the company of its momentum (this almost happened with the board of directors revolt at OpenAI).
- Something else I haven’t thought of.
But once a hiccup happens, something built on so many self-reinforcing loops is less resilient against the unknown, the chaos of the real world.
Not making a couple of loan payments. As soon as a big player does this, everyone else will be on edge.
A layer higher? Expose Palantir’s role in Israeli targeting and manipulation that includes global espionage with Epstein and others.
An easier way would be to restore democracy by making the right to digital slavery – ownership and trade of the digital presence of a person for exploitation and manipulation – illegal. That is the profitable and massive political capital driving the machine.
Ultimately it will be when the credit dries up and circular nature of the “investments” breaks down.
A Couple things that come to mind:
- data centre operators borrowing money to buy GPUs and then using those GPUs as collateral for loans to buy more GPUs
- nVidia investing money into companies contingent on their purchase of GPUs worth an order of magnitude greater than than their investment
- Microsoft selling Copilot below cost, provided by OpenAI selling GPT services below cost, in exchange for compute offered below cost
- A consensus that the cost of scaling users is not going to be the same as it has been with e-commerce and software (ie one user using Amazon.com vs 1 million users is roughly the same cost to build the software that runs Amazon.com while the cost scales directly with number of users of chatbots)
- a consensus that hallucinations are not a solvable problem
One way could be a failure to deliver on a contractual obligation with regards to a payout (eg company X will receive $100 billion when Y is complete) will lead to the failure to make a debt payment (company X has borrowed money based on the money promised by company Y), which will precipitate a scramble as investors try to recoup the money they’ve put in the firms, which will crash them.
For example, and I don’t know what happened here, CoreWeave had a balloon payment to make on a loan in October; if they didn’t make that payment, it could lead to a panic. But it seems that didn’t happen.
Fundamentally it all comes down to unemployment. There is a certain point in a thermodynamic way that even the most brainwashed slaves stop becoming productive. If you don’t have a safe and private place to sleep, it’s enormously taxing on your motivation, if you can’t afford nutrients, you will be physically tired and your body will scream at you to avoid any type of damage to itself, greatly lowerering your productivity that even a mostly post scarcity and automated economy can’t even support you, even if you work 60 hours a week for meager wages.
For bubbles, they exist mostly to make rich people richer, but come at the cost of workers getting more inflation and weaker purchasing power for their wages. Every so often bubbles have to pop, so the rich can buy up all the property they sold back, at a discount and start the process over. One of the many scams of international capitalism.
So the bubble really pops when people are unable to work for the dropping wages. It’s really just a physics question in a way. Not really a choice they make, because people who work often tie their entire identity into working and being a “good working citizen” as the media conditions them to think. It’s just physics. The bubble popping is the reality of things like markets correcting themselves.
What comes after is often a die off of workers causing their value to go up, since human sacrifice is the only way they can collectively bargain anymore. Then an eventual resettling with lower wages after prices are forced to not track inflation. This is why a house is 30% cheaper then it was in the 70s in gold price, but people need on average 10+ years wages to buy one. The prices of houses gradually came down over time as the workers made less money in real value(gold, silver, minerals, commodities), year after year for decades. The market is forced to lower the prices of houses just enough to get some suckers to buy them. Again, workers can’t just make money magically appear like the rich can, so there is a physical limit to how much a worker can pay before they quite literally starve, or develop severe health issues from eating potatoes for decades.
So the two poles of American style economics is physical constraints of reality, like the workers bodies ability to survive on potatoes and bread and sugar, and not having a mental breakdown because they live on a couch, and the greed of the rich who are completely self centered and want boats and mansions and most importantly, to be seen as valuable via their status and access to wealth and resources. These two poles form the tension in which the economy operates. The really sad part is, that this is probably an improvement over most of human history. Technology has made the lives of the average worker much better, despite capitalism taking every opportunity it can to try to squeeze more out of them, or keep them too miserable to resist.
appreciate you writing that out
Thxs I try to teach real economics when I can because people can’t learn this in universities or anything.
i can only think of ‘folkhögskolor’, a nordic phenomena where formerly peasants and now workers since a hundred years raise eachother to learn what gymnasiums and universities don’t and at no cost.
i appreciate you being online bringing knowledge around. got any recommended reading for economy, or a blog where you post more?
Thank you, that is very kind of you. I love that word. That is a very cynical take from me and I should probably be a bit more fair, but it’s not that far off from the truth.
The people who run these scams don’t necessarily realize they are doing it. They do to some extent, but even billionaires believe in capitalism in that kind of way.
I thought about writing little essays or making YouTube videos to kind of share what I consider to be lost knowledge and lost sciences. I should probably do that some day. Like actually write it out in more theoretical ways in a more compiled form.
i’ve been meaning to report on the state of nordic countries alot more. now i did a bit
i encourage you to compose some and share some!


