h/t to Ed Zitron: https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com/post/3mfxqjqoias2q

alt text

WSJ PATRICK SISON/ASSOCIATED PRESS Within hours of declaring that the federal government will end its use of artificial-intelligence tools made by tech company Anthropic, President Trump launched a major air attack in Iran with the help of those very same tools. Commands around the world, including U.S. Central Command in the Middle East, use Anthropic’s Claude AI tool, people familiar with the matter confirmed. Centcom declined to comment about specific systems being used in its ongoing operation against Iran. The command uses the tool for intelligence assessments, target identification and simulating battle scenarios even as tension between the company and Pentagon ratcheted up, the people said, highlighting how embedded the AI tools are in military operations. The administration and Anthropic have been feuding for months over how its AI models can be used by the Pentagon. Trump on Friday ordered agencies to stop working with the company and the Defense Department designated it a security threat and risk to its supply chain.

  • scruiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This really is the dumbest timeline.

    simulating battle scenarios

    Regurgitating reddit armchair generals from /r/noncredibledefense

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If they were talking about some complex simulation engine utilizing ML and research carefully collated and constructed, this would be at least interesting.

      But they aren’t. We shoved the entirety of text produced by the human race in a big pot, mixed it up, and extrude it by most likely connections. It is predictive of words and phrases, not of human behavior, physics of munitions, or anything actually useful for modeling warfare.

      They’re fucking generating war fanfic and using it to make stratgic decisions. Just hire Clancy, Crichton, Card, and/or whoever’s ghost writing for them now. It’d be cheaper.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, the fact that the nation’s highest military command no longer understands the difference between machine learning and an LLM is gravely concerning…

        They fired all the professionals in 2025. All that’s left are the sycophants.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe it has a bunch of leaked files from the WarThunder forums as well!

      Simulating battle scenarios is absolutely hilarious, adults standing around the magic 8 ball

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Simulated battle scenarios are a common component of wargaming. That doesn’t mean an LLM is the right tool for it, but it’s been a thing for a long time.

        The bigger concern here is using it for intelligence assessments and target acquisition, because LLMs hallucinate a lot.