IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.ml · 3 days ago[Video] Ring advertises mass surveillance capabilities in SuperBowl adi.imgur.comvideomessage-square120linkfedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down19
arrow-up1476arrow-down1video[Video] Ring advertises mass surveillance capabilities in SuperBowl adi.imgur.comIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square120linkfedilink
minus-squareaudaxdreik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up112arrow-down1·3 days ago“since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family” Yeah, because cats know how to evade the fascist state. All Cats Are Beautiful …
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·2 days ago400ish found out of 10 million is…incredibly pathetic, lol.
minus-squarefrunch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·2 days agoIt’s apparently enough justification to get people to consent to having their doorbell cams used for surveillance by 3rd parties 🫠
minus-squareyucandu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoYall do it with your smartphones and your airtags anyway.
minus-squarefrunch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 days agoI consented to that when i accepted the EULAs on all the stuff i signed up for online over the years. I’m not consenting to this though! 😉
minus-squareFlames5123@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAirTag doesn’t have facial recognition. Also there is no reverse engineering who an AirTag belongs to. Not even Apple can see in their databases.
minus-squaretomiant@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·3 days agoI mean there are some ugly damn cats, for real.
minus-squareBreezy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 days agoShut up. No. There. Is. Not!
minus-squaretomiant@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoThat is a chupacabra. Not a cat.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoI would massage all of his scalp wrinkles.
minus-squareBreezy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoAh i am feel ashamed. I wanted to put besides hairless cats. But i knew there are like a dozen cute ones in total. So i didnt thinking i was being mean. Im gonna downvote my own comment.
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoDon’t take the precious! Smeagol wants it!
minus-squaretomiant@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoIn this case the other end of the cat is cuter.
minus-squareToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoFucking dumbasses losing their dogs every day.
“since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family”
Yeah, because cats know how to evade the fascist state. All Cats Are Beautiful …
400ish found out of 10 million is…incredibly pathetic, lol.
It’s apparently enough justification to get people to consent to having their doorbell cams used for surveillance by 3rd parties 🫠
Yall do it with your smartphones and your airtags anyway.
I consented to that when i accepted the EULAs on all the stuff i signed up for online over the years. I’m not consenting to this though! 😉
AirTag doesn’t have facial recognition. Also there is no reverse engineering who an AirTag belongs to. Not even Apple can see in their databases.
I mean there are some ugly damn cats, for real.
Shut up. No. There. Is. Not!
goblin mode
That is a chupacabra. Not a cat.
I would massage all of his scalp wrinkles.
Ah i am feel ashamed. I wanted to put besides hairless cats. But i knew there are like a dozen cute ones in total. So i didnt thinking i was being mean.
Im gonna downvote my own comment.
Don’t take the precious! Smeagol wants it!
Ugly but cute. If hairless, 🤮.
In this case the other end of the cat is cuter.
Fucking dumbasses losing their dogs every day.