The title is a bit misleading, as the article lists diverging analysts’ opinions, ranging from Valve willing to sell at a loss or low margins, to high prices due to RAM and SSD price volatility.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blackeco.com/post/2330473

  • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And when they do, that hardware will be worthless shit, but steam still has to run of my 15 year old Debian/Fedora x86 box, and other companies are making handhelds like this now.

    • misk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Why does it have to? Valve isn’t known for maintaining legacy software. You assume your software will run forever as-is but you can see how that looks like in accelerated timeline in the case of Valve games on Macs.

        • misk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The equivalent of that $300 Dell in 10 years is even more likely to be locked down. Open hardware will become more and more niche, and therefore even more expensive comparatively. This is where the entire industry seems to be going.

            • misk@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Valve, unlike Dell, has the power to vertically integrate an ecosystem. They own an app store with de facto monopoly over PC gaming. If Valve says that starting 2030 you can only run Steam on Windows and their own locked down OS (and enforce that via bootloader or some other measure) what can you do about it? You only licensed games from them, never bought them.

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Why can’t they take back shit you ‘bought’ rather than just licensed?

                Ownership is just a licensing agreement under capitalism.

                I agree the problems are real, but they are not specific to valve.

                • misk@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 minutes ago

                  I’m dying on this hill because people act like Valve is different. If I had to guess it’s PC players that want to feel superior to others, even though they were first to lose access to physical copies of games and second hand market it provided.

                  • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 minutes ago

                    The thing is: they’re not different.

                    And their hardware isn’t, like; special; it’s a single board computer running the standard x86/64 architecture that ships with a lightly customized OS most users won’t change.

                    I’m more worried about what nvidia Intel and and are getting up to. They’ll fuck you first.

                    I guess valve kind of is special? They are a games company, so they don’t have big government contracts, they don’t work with palantir, and they dont work at a low enough level that they can easily install something my electrical engineer or hacker friends can’t possibly fix with a soldering iron.

                    Theyll fuck me, sure, yes, but the chip makers already have their pants down.