• zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is also why I have never considered the Switch a portable system. It was a hybrid that was never quite a “real” console or a handheld, and thus made compromises on both ends. I personally never used the Switch undocked, I’d have rather they sold a fixed model with no screen or joycons that just plugged in.

    The real reason that Game Gear was so power hungry is that it was just a Sega Master System crammed into a handheld. This is why it felt wildly better and more advanced then the Game Boy. Sega did the same thing years later with the Sega Nomad aka a Genesis crammed into a handheld.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      the real reason it was such a bitch for power is that it had a compact flourescent tube for the backlight.

      when you remove that and replace it with a LED backlight suddenly the battery life explodes.

          • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I can’t say I loved the Game gear enough to go that route, but seeing as I have had people try to argue with me that E.T. for the Atari 2600 is actually a fine game, there are enthusiasts for everything.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m generally of the same opinion about the Switch, but it’s amazing to be able to play it on flights