The points you list say nothing of anti-capitalism because they have never been anti-capitalist. Ever.
Doesn’t need to: it’s not for or against it.
It’s simply an independent concept: liberalism is a political & moral philosophy, not an economic one.
Socialism can be liberal, and it’s probably far superior to the mental disease that is authoritarian socialism.
There’s even libertarian marxism.
Liberalism in its many forms is the dominant ideology of the Western bourgeoisie and has been used time and time again to defend capitalism from radical change for two centuries now.
Biased, inaccurate definition of liberalism: definist fallacy.
Try again.
Doesn’t need to: it’s not for or against it. It’s simply an independent concept: liberalism is a political & moral philosophy, not an economic one.
Socialism can be liberal, and it’s probably far superior to the mental disease that is authoritarian socialism. There’s even libertarian marxism.
Biased, inaccurate definition of liberalism: definist fallacy. Try again.
Irrelevant authority fallacy: Marx is not an authority on liberalism. Try a proper definition.
👍
The upvote button is right there.