Controversy has erupted after 21% of manuscript reviews for an international AI conference were found to be generated by artificial intelligence.
You must log in or # to comment.
AI pushers using AI to show how legitimately upset they are over other people using AI to review their papers on AI.
That’s just proper dogfooding, right? RIGHT?
Using AI to determine if they were generated using AI.
“Written”
AI stands for all idiots
Something like “sowing wind, reaping storms” comes to mind…
