• Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Define “high quality.” For example, running double-blind studies with a control group in a scenario involving medical care for potentially suicidal patients isn’t really feasible because that would be widely considered to be super unethical, mmkay?

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sure there are established methods for studying interventions in people who are mentally ill or suicidal.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a very strange argument you are trying to build, it does not matter what random individuals think online. The standards for high quality evidence are already well established in medicine. You can argue with those bodies if you disagree. Write a paper perhaps?