Some things are distinctions without a difference, “ancaps”, “libertarians”, and “conservatives” are some of those things.

The distinctions between them are considered oh so important simply because you’re talking about mostly privileged individuals that want the appearance of being “free thinkers”. They want to pretend to have their own brand of politics above everyone else, but they still mostly vote for fucking Trump.

There really isn’t a lot of ideological range to the right of neoliberalism…and it mostly ranges from fascist-lite to full-blown fascism.

Both have the potential to fail tragically. Some forms of fascism are libertarianism being attempted and failing.

deleted by creator

Both Canada and the United Kingdom use FPTP voting and they have more than two viable parties that regularly win and hold seats.

Sure, but they also have prime ministers and parliaments, and are generally run differently from the United States which has had two main parties since its inception because that is what the system will produce.

I’m misreading you because it’s incoherent and read like apologia for LLMs.

It is being run like a business: poorly. Exactly how most businesses run.

You could try remembering things. Might be good practice.

I mean, we’re not exactly talking about a dream upon waking here…and you can remember those too with practice.

All of the games you listed here were pretty under hyped IMO except for perhaps Silksong.

I understand this is all subjective, but I think you’re leaning toward like indie gaming hipster material with this comment…and that’s my opinion.

Nah some people are murdered or die sudden deaths, but I get the sentiment.

The repubs should definitely nominate newsom over vance for president. He’d be a much better candidate than all of this maga crap.

Dude, I quoted you.

If you’re trying to dance around and say that you were saying “AI would do that” instead of LLMs…1) why? the AI=LLMs train has left the station and 2) are you lost? Because the article link you’re replying under is talking about LLMs

And if AI is going to be the last straw, how long can we put it off for? Could it pop next year or can we still hold it off for another decade with even more ludicrous number-fuckery? I think that’s where the trick is going to be.

The thing that boggles my mind in all of this is the possibility that Trump installs some absolute toady tool bag in at the Fed and then just has the federal reserve bail out all of the bad investments. It’d mean probably hyperinflation, but who cares about normal shmucks trying to live a life? It’s much more important to pay the genius, scammy billionaires so they can keep their mega yachts fully gassed and assed.

I remember the news reporting about record breaking amounts of mortgage defaults in like 2007 as well. The signs were all there, but people were too oblivious or high on their own supply of farts to see them.

Anytime people are like “we couldn’t see this coming” I never understand why they are allowed to pass that obvious lie off in public.

The AI bubble signs are in plain view everywhere you look right now. If (or much more likely when) it bursts everyone will be talking about how they couldn’t possibly see it coming again.

If people say they couldn’t see this shit coming, maybe their myopic asses shouldn’t be in charge of anything important ever again.

Ahahaha, what a hero

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ws-YEa9ykEs

A true believer

i meant generating truthful new knowledge

It’s amazing that you managed to try to pretend this thing will do what it cannot do.

AI in general? Sure, maybe at some point.

LLMs? Nope. Sorry. They’re basically an echo of sorts.

(As, you know, the study you’re posting under is showing.)

Yeah we all know that calculators are completely useless. 🙄