• sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, and while I bet they’d love it to be profitable, it’s not about that.

      Its about controlling information output and dominating conversations they want to participate in.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You can, they’ll just get drowned out by the “alternative facts”…

      You can probably get that ai to answer the exact opposite to all of those questions by rephrasing the questions a bit 😂

  • urno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Astounding that nobody considered that this might happen!

    Maybe the emperor’s new clothes just look too good?

    At the very least you would have expected them to coerce the reasoning like Musk did with grok…

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    turns out when you smear as much text as you can into a system and average it out, it doesn’t give the bias you are looking for; it gives the average of all the text you fed into it, even if it’s true or false.