• Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s really fascinating to me how AI pushers inevitably fall back to accusing anyone who isn’t singing the praises of LLMs as being “too emotional”.

    • wizblizz@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because once you shut down all their inane excuses, all they have left is gaslighting.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Everyone that doesn’t think like me is gaslighting me :(

        No one has yet to explain to me how a choice of software is a valid filter. All I get are emotional “well I don’t like it”, as if their friends have never done or used something they don’t approve of. People are really fiending for an echo chamber it seems, even in their own personal lives and not just online.

        It’s simply shallow, like if I said I’m not friends with apple users. I hate the company and am justified in that hate, but making or breaking friendships over it is childlike behavior.

        • wizblizz@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There are multiple examples in this post alone, I suggest you do more reading and less posting. If you need to be shown the door, I’ll be happy to do so.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We are talking about breaking friendships, and even a marriage in the author’s case, over software.

      I also think there’s a media campaign being waged to get people riled up. Some of these articles read like gop level rhetoric. The emotional aspect is very noticeable from the outside, especially when we get anything where the classic “protect the children” can apply.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You know the author isn’t married and stated as much, right? Getting this upset over their hypothetical marriage is a little extreme. Especially when the article says absolutely nothing about “protecting the children.”

        People are allowed to break off romantic and non-romantic relationships for whatever reason they desire. It sounds like you don’t particularly want to be friends or date anyone that doesn’t like AI, so I’m not sure what the problem is for you… that other people have different moral standards and world views than you?

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was hypothetical and the response to that hypothetical question was emotional.

          The children example was clearly talking about other articles.

          Yes, people are allowed to break up for whatever reason, but this specific reason is incredibly shallow.

          I do have friends that don’t like AI and I wouldn’t dream of dropping them because of it. It’s insane, it’s just a difference in opinion. I want meaningful relationships, not an echo chamber.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No, it has nothing to do with “if I like it” but the substance of the response. If the person said the opposite (dropped friends that didn’t like AI), I would have the same reaction.

              If their fiance tells them they use chatgpt and their first response is to call off the wedding, it’s clear there is little actual logic going on, which leaves emotion. It’s also incredibly shallow.

              This is “picking friends because of their favorite sport team” energy.